Not even Apple, with its myriad hidden preference flags for power users, treats us like this. Instead of telling me that you'll look into the matter, you're actually arguing with a user (which, mind you, is one of your earliest advocates and internal beta testers who has been asking for essential features for FOUR YEARS and being – or, at the very least, feeling –, err, a bit ignored) and saying, point-blank, that you'll remove this. I almost feel like not buying Publisher after all. I am genuinely disappointed in you, I'm not even kidding. I don't even think it needs much testing at this point, really… Maybe just validation, I guess. In a very predictable and workable fashion. I can (even if it's “by accident”, hence my suggestion of it being added “ by design”), and it absolutely works. Patrick, I don't mean to be rude, but that is patently false. It's a bug I will get it removed as it will cause confusion and raise expectations of being able to apply a baseline grid, which you cannot as you have found. You guys keep disappointing me more and more, I can't believe this. Removing it/omitting it just feels… petty, and… almost Adobe-like, if I must say so.
AFFINITY DESIGNER GRID AND SNAP CODE
And restrict it to Publisher owners, as you already do with its own Designer and Photo personas, if you must. I understand you may want to avoid feature bloat, but it's already in the code base. under Text > Baseline > Baseline manager), or as an extra tab under the Grid and Snapping Axis manager, or something.
AFFINITY DESIGNER GRID AND SNAP SOFTWARE
If this is a feature segmentation decision to avoid cannibalisation, or to keep the software simpler, at least tuck the option somewhere else, like a menu item (e.g. In fact, I make one or two every year in Illustrator, and I do miss having baseline grids, so… yeah. It's already there, and if it works… I know Designer isn't a DTP app, but for light, single-page work, such as academic posters, I could totally see myself using Designer instead of Publisher (especially some vector-heavy ones). So… how do you justify the presence of a “Snap to Baseline Grid” option in the snapping manager, then…? That seems a bit weird, to say the least. With a shared codebase all the applications understand any features that the others can create but that doesn't mean all applications have to let you edit and adjust those layers and features that can't be created in a new document. It's not just a few pixels - it's really visible to the naked eye.No, this feature will not be appearing in ADe or APh and if you can access it accidentally that needs fixing. It's clear that when something is aligned using the center green line, it's not centered at all. I do not have the grid enabled otherwise - I only did that for the screenshot and screen rec here. In the screen rec I also show the Snapping settings.
I have also enabled the grid so you can see that whatever the green snap line is finding is neither the grid nor the guide. I've attached a screenshot and screen rec. I've enabled them all and turned off one by one to see if anything changed.) I have already tried all kinds of other things based on searches here and nothing fixes this (eg, Force Pixel alignment, Snap to spread, Snap to layer geometry, etc. The only option I have set in Snapping is "snap to guides" for All Layers. I've checked if it was still aligning to the grid for some reason and it's also not aligned to the grid lines. My expectation is that when I am moving an object, once it is centered between the two closest vertical guides, the green line will appear to let me know. On another layer, I want to be able to select the Artistic Text and have it center in the table cell - this would be done by having it center between two vertical guides. I have a table on its own layer, which I then used to create the guides.
0 kommentar(er)
